| Peer-Reviewed

Animal Depictions in Baby Picture Books: Focusing on Food, Clothing, and Shelter

Received: 28 April 2023    Accepted: 23 May 2023    Published: 6 June 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Infants acquire various visual information from picture books. Picture books frequently feature animals, which are considered an important part of child development. This study quantitatively analyzed the depictions of animals in 669 baby picture books, focusing on their food, clothing, and shelter, and discussed the images that the authors had about animals, as well as the images and knowledge they might impart to infant readers. Mammals, such as rabbits and cats, appear in many baby picture books, with baby talk and onomatopoeia. Anthropomorphic rabbits and bears were particularly common among the clothed animals. Many animals were barefoot, and their body color was most often realistic. Anthropomorphic animals often prepared or consumed unrealistic food and drink using utensils. There were links between certain animals and food, including rabbits and carrots, cats and fish, dogs and bones, and bears and honey. A few illustrations of food were identified that should be given with caution or should not be given at all to real animals. Depictions of predation by carnivores and cruelty are avoided. Most animals were depicted without dwelling places. Rabbits and bears often appeared as anthropomorphic animals with their own houses. Cats and dogs were often depicted in humans’ homes, with cats being indoors and dogs in the garden. The authors depict many animals that are known and loved by children in consideration of infants who are acquiring language skills and their perception of the external world. The images held by the authors reflect the human–animal relationships; however, sometimes, they do not necessarily correspond to the actual ecology of animals. Baby picture books that advance the developmental process of infants would effectively convey the appropriate images and knowledge about animals to readers. Greater attention to animal expressions in picture books will help create better picture books with respect to children’s perception of animals, which may improve human–animal interactions.

Published in International Journal of Literature and Arts (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14
Page(s) 119-126
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Anthropomorphic Animals, Baby Picture Books, Child Development, Depictions of Animals, Human–Animal Interactions

References
[1] Fukuinkan Shoten (2022). Picture book selection guide. https://www.fukuinkan.co.jp (2022/12/2).
[2] Strouse, G. A., Nyhout, A., & Ganea, P. A. (2018). The role of book features in young children’s transfer of information from picture books to real-world contexts. Frontiers in Psychology (9) 50. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00050
[3] Pan, D. (2019). Picture book reading and the education of life philosophy for children. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (341) 997-1000. https://doi.org/10.2991/icadce-19.2019.216
[4] Legas, A. M. (2019) The human elements of child story books. International Journal of Literature and Arts (7) 38–42. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20190702.11
[5] Sato, K. (2004). Child development and picture book. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, Ehime University (51) 29–34.
[6] Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2017) Childcare guidelines. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/web/t_doc?dataId=00010450& atatype=0&pageNo=1 (2022/12/2).
[7] Shibamura, K., & Shimizu, T. (2004). Ages good for “picture books for babies”: From word comprehension to story comprehension. The Bulletin of Fuji Women’s College, Series II (42) 51–58.
[8] Nakamoto, M. (2004). Current trends in baby picture books and related research. Studies in Ikuei Junior College (21) 33–44 (in Japanese).
[9] Valenza, E., Simon, F., Cassia, V. M., & Umiltà, C. (1996). Face preference at birth. Perform (22) 892–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.892
[10] Sonoda, H. (2016). An analysis of the “0.1.2. children’s picture books”: A survey of caregiver’s speech and onomatopoeia concerning common animals and insects. Bulletin of the Teacher Training Research Center Attached to the Faculty of Education, Art and Science, Yamagata University (11) 39–48.
[11] Suttle, C. M., Banks, M. S., & Graf, E. W. (2002). FPL and sweep VEP to tritan stimuli in young human infants. Vision Research (42) 2879–2891. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00333-4
[12] Sasaki, H. (1974). Picture books and imagination. Kobundo Press (in Japanese).
[13] Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Charles A. Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science (296) 1321–1323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1070223
[14] DeLoache, J., Pickard, M. B., & LoBue, V. (2011). How very young children think about animals. In P. McCardle, S. McCune, J. A. Griffin & V. Maholmes (Eds.). How animals affect us: Examining the influence of human–animal interaction on child development and human health (pp. 85–99). American Psychological Association.
[15] LoBue, V., Pickard, M. B., Sherman, K., Axford, C., & DeLoache, J. S. (2012). Young children’s interest in live animals. British Journal of Developmental Psychology (31) 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2012.02078.x
[16] Robinson, I. (1995). The Waltham book of human–animal interaction: Benefits and responsibilities of pet ownership. Pergamon Press.
[17] Koshimura, Y. (2015). Current status and future prospects of the pet industry. Journal of Pet Animal Nutrition (18) 52–58. https://doi.org/10.11266/jpan.18.1_52 (in Japanese).
[18] Shimatani, H., & Koda, N. (2021). Dogs and cats and their relationships with humans as depicted in picture books. International Journal of Literature and Arts (9) 63–69. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210902.13
[19] Marriott, S. (2002). Red in tooth and claw? Images of nature in modern picture books. Children’s Literature in Education (33) 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019677931406
[20] Herrmann, P., Waxman, S. R., & Medin, D. L. (2010). Anthropocentrism is not the first step in children’s reasoning about the natural world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (107) 9979–9984. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1004440107
[21] McCrindle, C. M. E., & Odendaal, J. S. J. (1994). Animals in books used for preschool children. Anthrozoös (7) 135–146. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279394787001998
[22] Nakagawa, J., & Koda, N. (2023). Emotional depictions of dogs and cats in interactions with humans in picture books. People and Animals (6) Article 4.
[23] Waxman, S. R., Herrmann, P., Woodring, J., & Medin, D. L. (2014). Humans (really) are animals: Picture-book reading influences 5-year-old urban children’s construal of the relation between humans and non-human animals. Frontiers in Psychology (5) 172. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00172
[24] Kitawaki, T. (1999). Health industries aiming to promote mental and physical health. BME (13) 15–22. https://doi.org/10.11239/jsmbe1987.13.7_15 (in Japanese).
[25] Ishii, M., Inui, T., Suzuki, S., Seta, T., Matsui, T., & Watanabe, S. (1967). Children and literature. Fukuinkan Shoten (in Japanese).
[26] Nagami, I. (2006). What kind of act does child caring mean? Nagoya Ryujo (St. Mary’s) College Annual Report of Studies (28) 1–11.
[27] Takahashi, N. (1986). The studies of concern about clothing for early child. Bulletin of Research Institute of Domestic Science, Tokyo Kasei University (9) 7–14.
[28] Kuniie, J. (1969). Language development in early childhood. Jimbun Ronkyu (20) 54–71 (in Japanese).
[29] Berlin, B., & Kay, P. (1969). Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. University of California Press.
[30] Hooykaas, M. J. D., Holierhoek, M. G., Westerveld, J. S., Schilthuizen, M., & Smeets, L. (2022). Animal biodiversity and specificity in children’s picture books. Public Understanding of Science (31) 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221089811
[31] Furuichi, H., & Ohshika, K. (2019). Basic research on development of teaching materials in biological unit through a survey on children’s awareness of “living things.” JSSE Research Report (33) 51–54. https://doi.org/10.14935/jsser.33.8_51 (in Japanese).
[32] NHK Broadcasting Culture Research Institute (2022). How to add “san.” https://www.nhk.or.jp/bunken/research/kotoba/20200901_3.html (2022/12/2, in Japanese).
[33] Yokotani, K. & Hasegawa, K. (2009). Definition of the “deviant” family nicknames. Annual Reports of the Graduate School of Education, Tohoku University (58) 197–208.
[34] Shimono, M. (2010). The changes and differences of Japanese names from childhood to late youth. Treatises and Studies by the Faculty of Kinjô Gakuin University Studies in Humanities (6) 1–8.
[35] Lorenz, K. (1943). Die angeborenen Formen möglicher Erfahrung. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie (5) 235–409.
[36] Kringelbach, M. L., Stark, E. A., Alexander, C., Bornstein, M. H., & Stein, A. (2016). On cuteness: Unlocking the parental brain and beyond. Trends in Cognitive Sciences (20) 545–558. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.003
[37] Asai, A, & Ito, T. (2017). Language development of infants and their enjoyment of picture books. Toho Gakushi (46) 113–125. http://doi.org/10.20728/00000486 (in Japanese).
[38] Yaqubi, M., Tahir, R. I., & Amini, M. (2018). Translation of onomatopoeia: Somewhere between equivalence and function. Studies in Linguistics and Literature (2) 205–222. https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v2n3p205
[39] Fujino, Y. (2016). The effect of onomatopoeia cards for child and infant education. Studies in Information Science (25) 1–7.
[40] Murata, S. (2009). Three categories of the prefix “o” in Japanese language education. Studies in Humanities and Cultures (12) 205–219 (in Japanese).
[41] Ishida, O. (2013). Genealogy of attitudes toward animals. Japanese attitudes toward animals (pp. 1–16). University of Tokyo Press (in Japanese).
[42] Hiyoshi Taisha (2022). About masaru. http://hiyoshitaisha.jp/sarutoshi (2022/12/23, in Japanese).
[43] Sannou Matsuri (2022). Introduction of monkeys. https://www.tenkamatsuri.jp/about/monkey/index.html (2022/12/23, in Japanese).
[44] Kachi, M. (2008). Comparison of animals in Japanese and German folklore and proverbs: Introduction. Choeisha (in Japanese).
[45] Fuchu Art Museum (2021). Animal drawings. Kodansha (in Japanese).
[46] Burke, C. L., & Copenhaver, J. G. (2004). Animals as people in children’s literature. Language Arts (81) 205–213.
[47] Yano, S. (2002). Adventures over animal picture books. Keiso Shobo (in Japanese).
[48] Hara, K., & Koda, N. (2021). Conversion in depictions of anthropomorphic animals in picture books. International Journal of Literature and Arts (9) 374–383. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20210906.27
[49] Iwata, M., & Fujimoto, M. (2014). Talking animals: Images of animals as characters. Gobun (103) 43–54 (in Japanese).
[50] Turner, D. C., & Bateson, P. (1998). The domestic cat: The biology of its behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
[51] Liu, J. & Xia, J. (2018). The cat image in Japanese literature works during the ancient time to the beginning of modern age. Sapporo University Journal (46) 109–121.
[52] Ministry of the Environment (2010). Guidelines for the proper care of dogs and cats in densely populated residential areas. https://www.env.go.jp/nature/dobutsu/aigo/2_data/pamph/h2202.pdf (2022/12/2, in Japanese).
[53] Kimura, A., Wada, Y., Yang, J., Otsuka, Y., Dan, I., Masuda, T., Kanazawa, S., & Yamaguchi, M. K. (2010). Infants’ recognition of objects using canonical color. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (105) 256–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.002
[54] Asakura, T., Natori, K., & Emori, T. (2014). Study of the correspondence with recognition color and the image of the pen-devices-first report. Japanese Journal of Pharmaceutical and Diabetes (3) 128–138. https://doi.org/10.14933/jpds.3.128
[55] Hattori, M., Horiuchi, T., Katsuno, K., Itagaki, H., Kato, K., Inoue, Y., Maeda, M., Hanazono, M., & Akao, H. (2007). Why do children color rabbits pink? Study on concepts related to animals. Thinking of Animals (12) 23–28.
[56] Iris Ohyama (2019). Cat census in 2019. https://www.irisplaza.co.jp/media/A14025807205 (2022/12/2, in Japanese).
[57] Ishida, O. (2013). Animals as curiosities. Japanese attitudes toward animals (pp. 189–208). University of Tokyo Press (in Japanese).
[58] Tsuruno, S. & Yokosuka, M. (2012). Color atlas of exotic animals: Mammals, 3rd Edition. Midori Shobo (in Japanese).
[59] Nara, N. (2016). Nutrition for dogs and cats. Midori Shobo (in Japanese).
[60] Yamada, F. (2004). Die Wahrnehmungen von Grimms Marchen in Japan. Keio-Germanistik Jahresschrift (21) 60–79.
[61] Onose, M., Ishikuma, T., & Fukuzawa, S. (1993). A psychological study of a fairy tale, “Three little pigs” (2): A story preferred by kindergarten teachers. Tsukuba Psychological Research (15) 113–123.
[62] Yamaguchi, M. (2007). Development of infant’s spatial vision. Japanese Journal of Optics (36) 311–316.
[63] Ichitani, S. (1990). Infant–other interaction and development of self-recognition in the first two years of life. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology (38) 297–305. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep1953.38.3_297
[64] Japan Pet Food Association (2022). The national survey on dog and cat rearing in Japan. https://petfood.or.jp/data/chart2020/3.pdf (2023/1/17, in Japanese).
[65] Serpell, J. (1995). The domestic dog: Its evolution, behaviour and interactions with people. Cambridge University Press.
[66] Rogers, K. M. (2006). Cat. Reaktion Books.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Juri Nakagawa, Naoko Koda. (2023). Animal Depictions in Baby Picture Books: Focusing on Food, Clothing, and Shelter. International Journal of Literature and Arts, 11(3), 119-126. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Juri Nakagawa; Naoko Koda. Animal Depictions in Baby Picture Books: Focusing on Food, Clothing, and Shelter. Int. J. Lit. Arts 2023, 11(3), 119-126. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Juri Nakagawa, Naoko Koda. Animal Depictions in Baby Picture Books: Focusing on Food, Clothing, and Shelter. Int J Lit Arts. 2023;11(3):119-126. doi: 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14,
      author = {Juri Nakagawa and Naoko Koda},
      title = {Animal Depictions in Baby Picture Books: Focusing on Food, Clothing, and Shelter},
      journal = {International Journal of Literature and Arts},
      volume = {11},
      number = {3},
      pages = {119-126},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijla.20231103.14},
      abstract = {Infants acquire various visual information from picture books. Picture books frequently feature animals, which are considered an important part of child development. This study quantitatively analyzed the depictions of animals in 669 baby picture books, focusing on their food, clothing, and shelter, and discussed the images that the authors had about animals, as well as the images and knowledge they might impart to infant readers. Mammals, such as rabbits and cats, appear in many baby picture books, with baby talk and onomatopoeia. Anthropomorphic rabbits and bears were particularly common among the clothed animals. Many animals were barefoot, and their body color was most often realistic. Anthropomorphic animals often prepared or consumed unrealistic food and drink using utensils. There were links between certain animals and food, including rabbits and carrots, cats and fish, dogs and bones, and bears and honey. A few illustrations of food were identified that should be given with caution or should not be given at all to real animals. Depictions of predation by carnivores and cruelty are avoided. Most animals were depicted without dwelling places. Rabbits and bears often appeared as anthropomorphic animals with their own houses. Cats and dogs were often depicted in humans’ homes, with cats being indoors and dogs in the garden. The authors depict many animals that are known and loved by children in consideration of infants who are acquiring language skills and their perception of the external world. The images held by the authors reflect the human–animal relationships; however, sometimes, they do not necessarily correspond to the actual ecology of animals. Baby picture books that advance the developmental process of infants would effectively convey the appropriate images and knowledge about animals to readers. Greater attention to animal expressions in picture books will help create better picture books with respect to children’s perception of animals, which may improve human–animal interactions.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Animal Depictions in Baby Picture Books: Focusing on Food, Clothing, and Shelter
    AU  - Juri Nakagawa
    AU  - Naoko Koda
    Y1  - 2023/06/06
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14
    T2  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
    JF  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
    JO  - International Journal of Literature and Arts
    SP  - 119
    EP  - 126
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2331-057X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijla.20231103.14
    AB  - Infants acquire various visual information from picture books. Picture books frequently feature animals, which are considered an important part of child development. This study quantitatively analyzed the depictions of animals in 669 baby picture books, focusing on their food, clothing, and shelter, and discussed the images that the authors had about animals, as well as the images and knowledge they might impart to infant readers. Mammals, such as rabbits and cats, appear in many baby picture books, with baby talk and onomatopoeia. Anthropomorphic rabbits and bears were particularly common among the clothed animals. Many animals were barefoot, and their body color was most often realistic. Anthropomorphic animals often prepared or consumed unrealistic food and drink using utensils. There were links between certain animals and food, including rabbits and carrots, cats and fish, dogs and bones, and bears and honey. A few illustrations of food were identified that should be given with caution or should not be given at all to real animals. Depictions of predation by carnivores and cruelty are avoided. Most animals were depicted without dwelling places. Rabbits and bears often appeared as anthropomorphic animals with their own houses. Cats and dogs were often depicted in humans’ homes, with cats being indoors and dogs in the garden. The authors depict many animals that are known and loved by children in consideration of infants who are acquiring language skills and their perception of the external world. The images held by the authors reflect the human–animal relationships; however, sometimes, they do not necessarily correspond to the actual ecology of animals. Baby picture books that advance the developmental process of infants would effectively convey the appropriate images and knowledge about animals to readers. Greater attention to animal expressions in picture books will help create better picture books with respect to children’s perception of animals, which may improve human–animal interactions.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan

  • Graduate School of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan

  • Sections